Atlantic Council: Putin Should Not Decide Ukraine's Fate

• 8.02.2026, 16:30

A Moscow veto on the terms of the peace agreement would only exacerbate the Kremlin's aggression.

U.S.-led peace talks to end Russian aggression in Ukraine are raising serious doubts about their effectiveness. Skeptics question Putin's readiness for a long-term settlement, and many experts note the risk that the war will continue if Moscow gains a veto over Ukraine's security guarantees, writes Atlantic Council (translated by Charter97.org).

One of the controversial proposals is the idea of delaying the introduction of European troops until a truce is concluded. Experts believe that such an approach is doomed to failure, as it actually makes it easier for the Kremlin to block any actions aimed at preventing further aggression.

With U.S. priorities shifting and American interests moving away from ensuring European security, Europe must assert its own role in the negotiations. The "Coalition of the willing" initiative led by Britain and France, which allows European countries to participate in the peace process regardless of the U.S. position, could play a key role in this.

The deployment of European troops in Ukraine does not necessarily mean engaging in combat. The soldiers could help with training, guarding critical infrastructure and controlling the borders with Belarus, freeing up Ukrainian forces for other tasks. The presence of European colleagues would boost morale and demonstrate solidarity with Ukraine.

The main advantage is to demonstrate to the Kremlin that Russia does not have a veto over Ukraine's security guarantees. The experience of recent years shows that Putin's threats often turn out to be empty. A clear stance by European countries will help avoid Moscow's dictates and ensure Europe a place at the negotiating table instead of being left on the sidelines of history.